Filed under: Borrowing, Debt

Some time ago, a woman wrote a letter to The New York Times, explaining how her life had been pretty much ruined by a loan shark.

She had borrowed $50 when her daughter was sick and had to pay three consecutive monthly payments of $22. It began a cycle where she wound up broke and then foolishly went to another loan shark. She eventually lost her job (the loan shark went to her boss when she couldn’t make a payment), and finally began working at a new place of employment for a very small salary and naturally couldn’t pay the loan sharks she owed money to. She ended her letter by noting that “the blood-suckers are hounding me to death.”

She signed her letter, “Helpless.”

The year was 1908. One hundred years ago.

Today, that same letter could easily be written, only with the words “payday lending store” in place of “loan shark.” That stated, a payday lending company may telephone a home relentlessly, trying to get their money back and then some. They might sue a person in court. They may help make life miserable for some people, decimate their credit score, send them into bankruptcy and financially ruin them for years to come, but at least they can’t legally send someone to appear in your doorway and threaten your health, or stalk your boss.

Borrowing money with interest rates you can’t afford is still a poor idea — pun intended — but at least predatory lending offers a safer option out there than loan sharks.

Payday lending stores started to swell in the early 1980s when many banks, angling for better profits, moved out of poorer neighborhoods. That’s when the industry truly started to come into its own. It also didn’t help when, in 1979, laws were loosened governing interest rates on loans. Before 1979, each state loan capped how high an interest rate could go.

Arguably, the predatory loan industry can evolve even more beyond not breaking people’s legs — much, much more. On the other hand, with 13 says having banned or virtually eliminated the payday loan practice, and many others looking enjoy it may, one has to wonder if this path is just going to take us back where we started. Sure, plenty of people abuse the system, but I half wonder if this will just encourage anxious, occasionally-cash-strapped citizens who feel helpless to someday do something they never dreamed of doing — like meeting a loan shark in a dark alley.

Geoff Williams is a business journalist and the author of C.C. Pyle’s Astounding Foot Race: The True Story of the 1928 Coast-to-Coast Run Across America (Rodale).

Share This

Share This

Filed under: Top deals, Raising money, Investments, Shareholders, Value and lack thereof, Public or private?

According to a report from the Ernst & Young’s quarterly US IPO Pipeline Report, IPO activity is flattening as companies are waiting and watching to market to make their move. While that observation is obvious as a heart attack, there are some rather good details that may lead to help determine good IPO’s versus bad IPO’s in that report.

In the first quarter of 2008, 90 IPOs sat in the pipeline, the same amount as the last quarter of 2007. New registration was stable across the quarters, but the slide is still downward sequentially. In January there were 10 while February and March saw only 6 and 7, respectively. While the amount the registrations represent grew this quarter compared to last, $16.8 billion up to $17.3 billion, the numbers slowed toward the end of the quarter. It seems pre-IPO companies are holding tight and watching the market.

As expected, first quarter 2008 weakened compared to the first quarter in 2007. In the first quarter of 2007, 103 deals waited in the pipeline compared to 90 in 2008. In 2007, the registrants represented $22.8 billion compared to $17.3 billion in 2007. The average deal size also dropped, down to $192 million from $221 million. The largest deal in 2007, The Blackstone Group L.P. (NYSE: BX) reached $4.0 billion while in first quarter 2008, the largest was American Water Works at $1.6 billion. Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) was left off because of an end of quarter and for size issues as ‘one of a kind.’ Companies are also sitting in the pipeline much longer, 163 days on average compared to 113 in 2007.

Technology takes up the bulk of the pipeline with 26 registrants and $3.3 billion in dollar amount, up from $2.8 in fourth quarter 2007. Technology attracts foreign issuers with four out of five foreign issuers in the technology sector. While technology went up first quarter 2008, oil and gas dropped 60% from $5.3 billion fourth quarter 2007 to $1.9 billion. Biotech accounts for a solid 12 registrants and pharmaceuticals tally 11. California leads on a state-to-state basis, filing 16.7% of the total filings at 15. Texas and New York followed with 11 and 8, respectively.

Also according to the report… Patience and confidence are apt to ebb by June, but if you’re a good company with solid business plans, practices and proven results, opportunities still await you in the markets.

Share This

Share This

Filed under: Borrowing, Debt

In the last year, there has been a lot of movement afoot in state governments to either quash payday lending establishments or at least force them to bring down their interest rates. Here’s a quick snapshot of how things are going — or not going.

California: Earlier this month, just as they were going to vote on a bill that would have forced payday loan stores to cap their annual interest at 36%, effectively meaning that for each $100 a consumer borrowed, he would only have to pay back that $100 plus $1.60, legislators pulled back.

Oregon: Last July, a 36% annual cap was put on the payday lending industry, and 80% of the stores closed up and went out of business.

Illinois: In 2005, the say put forth many regulations for payday loans under 120 days. So lenders stopped issuing short-term loans and went for loans longer than 120, meaning their customers wind up paying more and going into more debt.

Ohio: They’re currently trying to pass Home Bill 333, which would do what California was trying to do.

Georgia: Since 2004, payday lending has been a felony. North Carolina has also banned the practice. All in all, there are 13 states in America that have banned or virtually wiped out the industry in their own states: Oregon, Arkansas, Connecticut, Georgia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont and West Virginia. They’re also illegal in the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.

And our neighbors to the north? Just as the payday loan stores are popping up everywhere in Canada, partially due to the influx of Americans going north to get cash, many provinces like Ontario are looking into legislation to regulate the industry.

Geoff Williams is a business journalist and the author of C.C. Pyle’s Amazing Foot Race: The True Story of the 1928 Coast-to-Coast Run Across America (Rodale).

Share This

Share This